I Love Belgium... and you?
CeD
Cookies éphémères (7 jours au plus) pour les utilisateurs authentifiés uniquement. Aucun traçage.
Temporary cookies (7 days max) for authenticated users only. No tracking.

Home page > I. Public > 2. Chez Euterpe > 2a. Audio > Original Jazz Sound?

Original Jazz Sound?

Do not buy

21 November 2012, by CeD

Other versions of this article:


See online : Original Jazz Sound, misnamed label

An un­scrupu­lous pro­duc­er mer­chant is selling on all on­line mu­sic plat­forms [1] a col­lec­tion en­ti­tled “Original Jazz Sound” reis­su­ing the jazz her­itage now out of copy­right, i.e. pri­or to 1961. If we com­pare the au­dio qual­i­ty of the­se re­leas­es with the orig­i­nal ones, even old, the au­dio qual­i­ty im­me­di­ate­ly ap­pears to be so down­grad­ed that it is in­audi­ble. [2]

Useful point: there is no re­ver­sal or mis­take here. The first link is the un­mod­i­fied 1954 au­dio, the sec­ond one is the 2011 “re­mas­tered” (sic) au­dio, both from the same mas­ter tape, same record­ing ses­sion. Furthermore, I checked about ten other OJS records: all are mas­sive­ly down­grad­ed com­pared with the orig­i­nal CD’s in my per­son­al mu­sic li­brary.

So, they are selling cheap (4 €) re­leas­es of out­stand­ing records, but wrecked to such an ex­tent that those who still have to dis­cov­er them will be dis­gust­ed. For on­ly 10 €, which is re­al­ly af­ford­able, you may buy au­then­tic and re­spect­ful re­leas­es. 57 years of tech­ni­cal im­prove­ments to come to this…

Not on­ly the goods are not what they were de­scribed to be, but the­se re­leas­es are a mis­deed and pure van­dal­ism. Difficult to un­der­stand the mo­ti­va­tion be­hind it, as there is no rea­son why the cost of this poor sound would be low­er than the orig­i­nal one. I’m won­der­ing on the weird tech­niques used to de­stroy the­se ex­cel­lent record­ings made half a cen­tu­ry ago. [3]

Original Jazz Sound re­leas­es come with a so-called “dig­i­tal PDF book­let” which is just an ad­ver­tise­ment for this la­bel, with­out any rel­e­vant in­for­ma­tion.

P.S.

See al­so this

Footnotes

[1] Including Qobuz, un­for­tu­nate­ly.

[2] The tiny sound is still very bad after hav­ing been am­pli­fied to the orig­i­nal level. At the very best, this will re­sult in a near-MP3/32 kbps qual­i­ty. Terrible.

[3] This ses­sion was record­ed in 1954 by Mr. Rudy Van Gelder, who is far from in­com­pe­tent to say the least. Rudy, if you read me, you should protest again­st this in­sult to your out­stand­ing work.

1 Message

  • Original Jazz Sound?

    22 November 2012 15:55, by objectifnul
    Note: ap­par­ent­ly, after the French ver­sion of this post was men­tioned in my iden­ti.ca time­line, the pub­lish­er of OJS records claimed and ob­tained the clo­sure of my iden­ti.ca ac­count. That is the rea­son why (i) this post was trans­lat­ed in­to English, (ii) its English ver­sion was an­nounced in sev­er­al Twitter time­li­nes.

Follow-up of the site's activity RSS site | RSS brèves RSS brèves | Site Map | Private area | Écrire au taulier | Stop Spam Harvesters, Join Project Honey Pot | Creative Commons
that In a origin Fernando
that In a origin Fernando
that In a origin Fernando
that In a origin Fernando
write me